THE ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY ACT OF 1997
The Endangered Species Act ("ESA") was originally enacted in 1973 to conserve
endangered and threatened species and their habitat. While the Act's goal of
promoting the "recovery" of endangered species enjoys widespread support,
implementation of the ESA has been the source of significant controversy. The
Endangered Species Recovery Act of 1997 reauthorizes and improves the ESA. The
major provisions of the bill are summarized below:
SECTION 2 -- LISTING OF SPECIES
Under current law, the Secretary of the Interior, or the Secretary of Commerce with
respect to marine species, is required to list any species as endangered or threatened
if, based on the best scientific and commercial data available, the species is in danger
of extinction or will be in the foreseeable future. The scientific basis for listing
individual species has been the subject of considerable controversy. In order to
enhance public confidence in the listing process, the bill places greater emphasis on
the use of good science and public participation.
Good Science
Where the Act requires the Secretary to use the best scientific and commercial data
available, the bill requires the Secretary, in evaluating comparable data, to give greater
weight to data that is empirical, field-tested, or peer-reviewed.
Delisting
The bill requires the Secretary to initiate the procedures for determining whether to
delist a species once the recovery goal for the species has been met.
Minimum Requirements for Listing Petitions
The bill establishes minimum scientific requirements for petitions to list, delist or
change the status of a species. Among other things, petitions submitted under the bill
must include a description of the available data on the historical and current range of
the species, an appraisal of the data on the status of the species, and of any threats
to the species. The petition must also identify which information in the petition has
been peer reviewed.
Greater Role For The States
The bill recognizes that States should have a greater role in the listing process.
Under the bill, affected state fish and wildlife agencies must be given notice of any
petition which includes the required minimum documentation or of any listing initiated
by the Secretary. The Secretary must solicit and consider the views of the state
agency.
Public Hearings
If requested, the bill requires the Secretary to hold at least one public hearing on a proposed listing in each affected State (including one hearing in an affected rural area, if any), up to a total of 5 hearings.
Call for More Data
Along with a proposal to list a species, the bill requires the Secretary to identify and
publish in the Federal Register a description of additional scientific and commercial
data that would assist in the development of a recovery plan and to invite any person
to submit the information to the Secretary.
Independent Peer Review
The bill establishes a process for independent peer review by three scientists,
nominated by the National Academy of Sciences and appointed by the Secretary,
for all listing and delisting decisions.
Distinguishing Between Endangered and Threatened Species
The bill requires the Secretary to issue a species specific "special rule" under section
4(d) of the Act for species listed as threatened in the future by no later than 30
months after the species is listed. The special rule allows the Secretary to provide
greater management flexibility for threatened species.
SECTION 3 -- ENHANCED RECOVERY PLANNING
The linchpin of the ESA is the recovery of endangered and threatened species. The
bill significantly strengthens the recovery planning and implementation process by
more clearly focusing the Act on saving species and removing them from the
endangered species list. The bill creates a new Section 5 on recovery plans that
includes:
- deadlines for the development of recovery plans for each listed species;
- a new requirement that recovery plans be developed by
broadly representative recovery teams, appointed by the Secretary;
- substantive requirements for the contents of recovery plans, including an
objective biological recovery goal as well as general and site-specific recovery
measures to achieve that goal; and
- authority for the Secretary to enter into recovery plan implementation
agreements with federal agencies and other parties.
Deadlines for Developing Recovery Plans
The bill establishes deadlines for the development of draft and final recovery plans.
For newly listed species, a draft recovery plan must be published within 18 months
of a final listing decision and a final plan must be published within 30 months of the
listing decision. Plans for species already listed, and for which no plans have been
developed, must be completed within 60 months of the date of enactment of this
Act, with half of those to be completed within 36 months.
Involve Stakeholders and Scientific Experts in the Development of Recovery Plans
To promote broader participation in the development of draft recovery plans, the bill
requires that most draft plans be developed by recovery teams appointed by the
Secretary. The teams shall include representatives of local governments, academic
institutions, private individuals and organizations, as well as state and federal
agencies. In addition to developing the draft recovery plan, the recovery team is
charged with advising the Secretary on designation of critical habitat.
Adding "Teeth" to Recovery Plans
The bill recognizes that recovery plans are the road map for conserving threatened
and endangered species. In order to make recovery plans more effective, the bill
establishes minimum requirements for the contents of recovery plans, including: a
biological recovery goal, expressed as measurable and objective criteria; objective,
measurable benchmarks to determine whether progress is being made towards the
recovery goal; general and site-specific recovery measures to achieve the recovery
goal; and an identification of those federal agencies whose actions are likely to
have a significant impact on the recovery of a species. Recovery plans must be
based on the best scientific and commercial data available.
Consideration of Costs
Recovery measures must meet the recovery goal and must do so in a way that
achieves an appropriate balance among the following factors: the effectiveness of
the measures in meeting the recovery goal, the time period in which recovery will
be achieved, and the social and economic impacts of the those measures. Each
draft recovery plan must include a description of any alternative recovery measures
that were considered, but not recommended, and provide an explanation as to why
they were not recommended.
If the recommended recovery measures would impose significant costs on a
municipality, county, region or industry, the recovery team must describe the
overall economic effects of implementing the plan on the public and private sectors,
including the effects on employment, public revenues and the value of property.
Selection of Recovery Measures
The bill requires the Secretary to hold up to 5 public hearings on draft plans in
affected States. After notice and opportunity for public comment, the Secretary
retains the authority to approve the final recovery plan. If the Secretary selects
recovery measures to meet the recovery goal other than those recommended by the
recovery team, the Secretary must explain why the recommended measures were
not selected.
Implementation Agreements
In many instances, recovery plans that have been developed are not being fully
implemented. The bill requires federal agencies identified in a recovery plan to
enter into implementation agreements with the Secretary to implement recovery
measures identified in recovery plans. State and local governments, private
property owners, and other organizations may also enter into implementation
agreements.
The bill waives section 7 consultation for actions authorized, funded, or carried out
by a federal agency specified in an implementation agreement provided that the
agreement sets forth sufficient information on the nature, scope, and duration of
the action. If a non-federal person proposes to include in an implementation
agreement a site-specific action that requires authorization or funding from one or
more federal agencies, the bill requires those agencies to participate in the
development of the agreement. At that time, the bill requires those agencies to
identify all measures for the species that would be required under the ESA as a
condition of that authorization or funding.
States May Assume Responsibility for Recovery Planning
The bill authorizes qualified state fish and wildlife agencies, either individually or
working together, to develop a draft recovery plan for an endangered or threatened
species. Under this authority, the state agency may appoint the recovery team and
submit the draft recovery plan to the Secretary for final approval.
Critical Habitat Designation
Under current law, the Secretary is generally required to designate critical habitat at
the time that a species is listed. At that point, however, the Secretary often does
not have sufficient information to designate critical habitat. In practice, critical
habitat is rarely designated at the time of listing, if at all. The bill revises the
current requirement to allow the Secretary to designate critical habitat 30 months
after listing, along with the final recovery plan. This will allow the Secretary to
take advantage of the expertise and recommendations of the recovery team.
SECTION 4 -- INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION AND COOPERATION
Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA requires each federal agency to consult with the Fish
and Wildlife Service (or the National Marine Fisheries Service for certain species) to
ensure that agency actions are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a
threatened or endangered species or destroy critical habitat. This consultation
process is required not only for activities that affect listed species on public lands,
but also for activities that require federal permits that affect listed species on
private lands. The bill includes provisions to streamline the consultation process.
Inventory of Species
The bill requires each federal land management agency to develop an inventory of
endangered, threatened, proposed and candidate species on lands or waters owned
or under control of the agency and to update the inventory every five years.
Streamline Consultation Process
The bill provides federal action agencies with greater responsibility for determining
when formal consultations are required. Under the bill, each federal agency would
be required to notify the Secretary before commencing an action that "may affect"
listed species or critical habitat. Consultation with the Secretary is required on
these actions unless the federal action agency determines that the proposed action
"is not likely to adversely affect" a listed species or critical habitat, notifies the
Secretary of that determination, and the Secretary does not object to the
determination in writing within 60 days. If the Secretary objects to the
determination, formal consultation is initiated. The bill authorizes the Secretary to
exclude by regulation categories of actions from this streamlined process that are
likely to have an adverse effect on a species or critical habitat.
Reports
The bill directs the National Academy of Sciences and the Government Accounting Office to prepare reports for the Congress on implementation of the new streamlined consultation process.
.
Consultation on Forest Plans
Several lawsuits (including the Pacific Rivers Council suits) have enjoined or
threatened to enjoin site-specific activities that may affect newly listed species in
national forests until the U.S. Forest Service completes formal consultation on the
land and resource management plans for those forests. The bill addresses these
situations by allowing site-specific actions on national forests or BLM lands to
proceed, provided they comply with section 7 as appropriate, while consultation on
the forest or land management plan is underway. Consultation on the forest plan
or BLM plan must be completed within one year of the date on which it is initiated.
Increased Coordination and Efficiency
The bill will increase efficiency by allowing the Secretary to consolidate Section 7
consultations for a number of actions within a particular geographic region. This
would apply to related or similar actions by one federal agency or actions involving
several federal agencies which affect the same species.
Increased State Role
The bill requires the Secretary, when consulting on a federal action affecting a
listed species or critical habitat, to solicit and consider information from the State
fish and wildlife agency in each affected State.
Give Permit Applicants a Greater Role in Consultation
One common criticism of the Section 7 consultation requirements is that, in cases
involving private citizens requiring federal permits or approvals, the parties who are
most affected by the consultation are not given adequate access to the process.
The bill requires the Secretary to provide any person who has sought authorization
or funding from a federal agency on which consultation is required an opportunity
to submit information prior to the development of a draft biological opinion, to
discuss the information with the Secretary, to receive information used by the
Secretary in developing the draft and final biological opinion, and to receive a copy
of the draft biological opinion and submit comments on it.
Reasonable and Prudent Measures
The bill provides that mitigation for incidental taking resulting from an activity that
is the subject of a consultation shall be related both in nature and extent to the
effect of the proposed activity.
SECTION 5 -- CONSERVATION PLANS
Under the ESA, people whose land is occupied by threatened or endangered species
are able to get "incidental take" permits in return for carrying out habitat
conservation plans ("HCPs") on their property. These permits, in turn, allow
landowners to carry out economic activities on their property that may incidentally
harm listed species. The bill authorizes multiple species conservation plans,
provides a more streamlined HCP process to address the needs of small private
landowners, and encourages voluntary actions to conserve species before they are
on the brink of extinction.
Multiple Species Conservation Plans
The bill authorizes private landowners to develop conservation plans for multiple
species that depend on the same habitat. By considering the needs of several
species at once, this approach will help address the needs of both species and
private landowners. For listed species, the plan must satisfy the criteria under
current law. For proposed and candidate species, the bill requires that the actions
taken by the applicant, if undertaken by all similarly situated persons, must be likely
to eliminate the need to list the species. For other non-listed species, the bill
requires that the actions taken by the applicant, if undertaken by all similarly
situated persons, must not be likely to contribute to a determination to list the
species.
Low Effect Conservation Plans
The bill establishes a streamlined HCP process for activities that will have no more
than a negligible effect, both cumulatively and individually, on a species. To
minimize the cost to small landowners, the bill requires the Secretary, in
cooperation with State fish and wildlife agencies, to develop a model permit
application that can serve as the conservation plan.
No Surprises Policy
The bill ensures that landowners who develop HCPs and receive incidental take
permits will not be required to spend more money or set aside additional land for
conservation of species covered by the plan.
Candidate Conservation Agreements
In many instances, preserving habitat and undertaking conservation measures before a species is listed can prevent the need to list a species. The bill authorizes non-Federal persons, at their request, to enter into candidate conservation agreements with the Secretary for candidate and proposed species. Actions taken under the agreement, if undertaken by all similarly situated persons, must be likely to eliminate the need to list the species. Landowners who enter into candidate conservation agreements would receive essentially the same "no surprises" assurances as a landowner who entered into an HCP.
Safe Harbor Agreements
Fear that requirements under the ESA will restrict use of land occupied by
threatened or endangered species acts as a disincentive that prevents many
landowners from taking voluntary steps to conserve species on their property. The
bill helps address this problem by authorizing "safe harbor agreements". This
provision encourages landowners to enter into voluntary agreements with the
Secretary that benefit conservation of listed species by assuring these landowners
that their efforts to maintain, create, restore or improve habitat will not subject
them to additional liability under the ESA.
Habitat Reserve Agreements
The bill authorizes the Secretary to enter into habitat reserve agreements with non-Federal persons to protect, manage or enhance suitable habitat for endangered or
threatened species. The Secretary is authorized to make payments to a property
owner to carry out the terms of the agreement. The bill authorizes ten million
dollars per year to the Secretary of the Interior and five million dollars per year to
the Secretary of Commerce to carry out this program.
Habitat Conservation Planning Fund
The bill establishes a revolving loan fund known as the "Habitat Conservation Planning Fund" to assist States and local governments in the development of HCPs.
NAS Report
The bill directs the Secretary to contract with the National Academy of Sciences to
review and prepare a report on the development and implementation of
conservations plans.
SECTION 6 -- ENFORCEMENT
Incidental Take Actions
The bill clarifies that in order to maintain an action for an incidental take prohibited
by Section 9 of the ESA, the person bringing the action must establish, using
scientifically valid principles, that the activity has caused, or will cause, the take of
a listed species.
SECTION 7 -- EDUCATION AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
The bill will provide more effective communication between the Secretary and
private landowners regarding the requirements of the ESA by establishing a
"Property Owners Education and Technical Assistance Program." Under this
program, the Secretary is directed to inform the public about the ESA, respond to
requests for technical assistance, and recognize exemplary efforts to conserve
species on private lands.
SECTION 8 --AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS
The bill reauthorizes the ESA through fiscal year 2003. Authorization of
appropriations would increase by fiscal year 2000 for the Department of the Interior
to 165 million dollars and for the Department of Commerce to 70 million dollars.
The authorization of appropriations for the Department of Agriculture would be
increased to 4 million dollars for each of fiscal years 1998 through 2003.
In addition, the bill includes authorization of appropriations for implementing the
safe harbor program, establishing the habitat conservation planning fund, providing
financial assistance for recovery plan implementation agreements, and assisting
state fish and wildlife agencies in carrying out conservation activities under the Act.
SECTION 9 -- OTHER AMENDMENTS
No Take Agreements
The bill authorizes the Secretary to enter into agreements with property owners, at the request of the property owner, that identify activities that will not result in a prohibited take of an endangered or threatened species.