CITY OF HAMILTON
For more
information, please contact:
Michael J.
Samoviski, P.E., City Manager, City of Hamilton, (513) 785-7005; Fax: (513)
785-7010
Ralph E.
Reigelsperger, P.E., Director of Public Works (513) 785-7272; Fax:
(513)785-7269
Phase II Storm Water Program
Mr. Chairman and Committee members, thank you for granting
the City of Hamilton this opportunity to testify before you today.
The City of Hamilton is located in the southwest portion of the
State of Ohio and has a population of somewhat more than 60,000 people. Hamilton operates a Publicly Owned Treatment
Works, including a Wastewater Treatment Plant and 212.7 miles of sanitary sewer
lines. Hamilton also maintains a
separate storm water collection system consisting of 180.5 miles of storm sewer
and 6,500 catch basins.
In 1999, the US EPA promulgated
Phase II Storm Water Rules which require covered political jurisdictions to
obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System - General Storm Water
Discharge Permit, which Hamilton received in April 2003. To obtain
this Permit, Hamilton was first required to develop a Storm Water
Management Plan, which the City submitted to Ohio EPA in March 2003. This Plan encompasses the 6 minimum controls
mandated by the Phase II Rules.
Hamilton’s City Council is
seriously concerned about municipal implementation and enforcement of this
recently issued General Storm Water Discharge Permit, especially in light of
our very challenging local and state economic climates. As the City prepared its Storm Water
Management Plan, it became apparent to City Council that the costs associated
with its implementation will have to be assumed by our local government, or
more likely by our citizens and businesses since surplus municipal monies for
this purpose are non-existent.
To pay for its Phase II Program,
the City of Hamilton anticipates having to form and implement a Storm Water
Utility. Storm Water Utility charges
will be based upon the amount of impervious area on parcels of land. In this manner, each parcel of land within
the City of Hamilton would be assigned a fee determined by its runoff
characteristics.
According to the Ohio Supreme
Court, storm water fees of this sort, since they are utility charges, must be
applied in an even and consistent manner without regard to tax status or land
use. This means that all
residents, businesses, schools, churches, governmental and institutional
complexes, etc. will have to be subject to these charges, without
exception. Each residential unit would
have to pay a flat monthly charge; but, non-residential properties would pay a
higher amount equivalent to the relative expanse of impervious surfaces at
their locations.
The City of Hamilton’s projected
annual expense attributable to having to comply with the new Phase II Program
is an additional $1.6 Million over the current $800,000 that the City now
spends on storm water activities. Since
Phase II is a federally unfunded mandate, the City of Hamilton expects to have
to raise this revenue by imposing a monthly fee of up to $5.50 on residential
customers. Non-residential customers
would be charged $5.50 multiplied by a factor which takes into account the
proportional increase of impervious area.
The following examples help to
drive home our point: Hamilton’s First
Baptist Church, with its associated parking area, was determined to have an
impervious factor of 68 times that of a single equivalent residential unit
(ERU). As a result, the Church’s
projected Storm Water Utility charge is calculated to be $374 per month ($5.50
multiplied by 68). Smart Paper Company, a manufacturer of high quality papers,
has an impervious factor of 912 ERU’s, and its monthly charge would be $5017. Hamilton High School has an impervious area
equal to 243 ERU’s; its monthly charge would be $1338. The local airport in Hamilton has 584 ERU’s
associated with its runways and other impervious areas which results in a $3215
monthly charge. Hamilton Scrap
Processors, a privately owned recycler, with 88 ERU’s would have to pay $484
monthly.
This federally unfunded mandate is
being imposed upon local communities at a time when our economies are stagnant,
and our nation is facing huge deficits as forecast by public financial
officers. The City of Hamilton is no
exception: local budget deficits are already predicted for 2004, and the
state’s budget is in such distress that no funding for cities and counties is
available for Phase II compliance.
Now is not the time for distressed
cities, such as the City of Hamilton, to have to impose a new monthly Storm
Water Utility charge across the community to achieve Phase II compliance. When the local economy improves, Hamilton’s
businesses and citizens may be better able to absorb this type of fee. In our current flagging economy, however, our
local businesses cannot afford this additional expense. Nor can our citizens who have very recently
been called upon to take on more of the municipal financial burden,
specifically more of the public safety burden, by paying more in taxes for
police and firefighter staffing at the local government level.
Please let me emphasize again that
the time for implementation of this Phase II Program is not now. Accordingly, the City of Hamilton
respectfully asks that you, as our elected federal representatives in
Washington, commence action before Congress to enact a five-year
moratorium. This moratorium could
postpone the unfunded mandate to a time better suited for requiring communities, such as our distressed city, to
step forward and implement the Phase II Rules and to impose additional
financial burdens on both your and our constituents.
We ask this not because the City
of Hamilton is seeking to avoid serving as a good steward of its river and
receiving waters, but because we are concerned public officials seeking to
strike a reasonable balance between the stark reality of our current depressed
local economy and continuing environmental improvement.
Page 2
Thank you again for your attention and courtesy in
allowing us to address this Committee.
We were honored to have received your invitation to appear before you to
present our concerns.
Testimony
Presented By: Michael J. Samoviski, P.E., City Manager and
Director of Public Safety, City of Hamilton, Ohio
In
association with Ralph E. Reigelsperger, P.E., Director
of Public Works, City of Hamilton, Ohio
Attachments:
Storm Water
Utility Projected Income Statement 2003-2008 (Cost Projections)
Ohio Department of Development Distressed City
Designation Materials:
Resolution
R2001-4-23, adopted April 25, 2001 by Hamilton City Council
May
10, 2001 Letter from Timothy E. Bigler to Joseph C. Robertson
June
8, 2001 Letter from Joseph C. Robertson to Mayor Adolf Olivas
February 27, 2003 letter from Michael J. Samoviski
to Senator George V. Voinovich
February 27, 2003 letter from Michael J. Samoviski
to Representative John Boehner
July 15, 2003, letter from Senator Mike DeWine to
Marianne Lamont Horinko
Hamilton Profile Material:
Hamilton
– A Cincinnati Magazine Special Urban Section
Page 3